劳埃德-琼斯爵士（Hugh Lloyd-Jones），英国古典学家，牛津大学钦定古希腊教授，著作等身。参与主编米南德的《狄斯克鲁斯》，大型古典丛书“牛津古典文丛”中的索福克勒斯卷，以及大名鼎鼎的“洛布古典丛书”中的埃斯库罗斯残篇和索福克勒斯两卷亦由他负责编译。劳埃德-琼斯教授是英国人文和社会科学院院士，五家外国学会的成员，拥有多所大学的荣誉博士学位。1989年从钦定教席上荣休，被授予“爵士”称号。《宙斯的正义》是其众多著述中的一部代表作。

劳埃德-琼斯爵士（Hugh Lloyd-Jones），英国古典学家，牛津大学钦定古希腊教授，著作等身。参与主编米南德的《狄斯克鲁斯》，大型古典丛书“牛津古典文丛”中的索福克勒斯卷，以及大名鼎鼎的“洛布古典丛书”中的埃斯库罗斯残篇和索福克勒斯两卷亦由他负责编译。劳埃德-琼斯教授是英国人文和社会科学院院士，五家外国学会的成员，拥有多所大学的荣誉博士学位。1989年从钦定教席上荣休，被授予“爵士”称号。《宙斯的正义》是其众多著述中的一部代表作。

In Concepts of Justice D. D. Raphael gives a philosophical survey of the development of the idea of justice. While the framework is historical, the aim is philosophical analysis and criticism. Part I begins with 'Ancient Roots': justice in the Bible, in Aeschylus' Oresteia, in the philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and among jurists and theologians in the Middle Ages. Part II, '...(展开全部)

In Concepts of Justice D. D. Raphael gives a philosophical survey of the development of the idea of justice. While the framework is historical, the aim is philosophical analysis and criticism. Part I begins with 'Ancient Roots': justice in the Bible, in Aeschylus' Oresteia, in the philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and among jurists and theologians in the Middle Ages. Part II, '...(展开全部)

In Concepts of Justice D. D. Raphael gives a philosophical survey of the development of the idea of justice. While the framework is historical, the aim is philosophical analysis and criticism. Part I begins with 'Ancient Roots': justice in the Bible, in Aeschylus' Oresteia, in the philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and among jurists and theologians in the Middle Ages. Part II, '...(展开全部)

In Concepts of Justice D. D. Raphael gives a philosophical survey of the development of the idea of justice. While the framework is historical, the aim is philosophical analysis and criticism. Part I begins with 'Ancient Roots': justice in the Bible, in Aeschylus' Oresteia, in the philosophers Plato and Aristotle, and among jurists and theologians in the Middle Ages. Part II, '...(展开全部)

A Theory of Justice is a widely-read book of political and moral philosophy by John Rawls. It was originally published in 1971 and revised in both 1975 (for the translated editions) and 1999. In A Theory of Justice, Rawls attempts to solve the problem of distributive justice by utilising a variant of the familiar device of the social contract. The resultant theory is known as "...(展开全部)

What is justice? Questions of justice are questions about what people are due, but what that means in practice depends on context. Depending on context, the formal question of what people are due is answered by principles of desert, reciprocity, equality, or need. Justice, thus, is a constellation of elements that exhibit a degree of integration and unity, but the integrity of...(展开全部)

This text critiques economists' conceptions of justice from a philosophical perspective and philosophical theories of distributive justice from an economic one. He unites the economist's skill in constructing precise axiomatic models with the philosopher's in exploring the assumptions of those models. His synthesis should enable philosophers and economists to engage each other'...(展开全部)

Equally at home in economic theory and political philosophy, John Roemer has written a unique book that critiques economists’ conceptions of justice from a philosophical perspective and philosophical theories of distributive justice from an economic one. He unites the economist’s skill in constructing precise, axiomatic models with the philosopher’s in exploring the assumptions...(展开全部)